Skip to content Skip to navigation
See our Campus Ready site for the most up to date information about instruction.Campus ReadyCOVID Help

The Bab and Judaism I : The Bab and Persian Jews of the Early Qajar period, Shiraz, Bushire and elsewhere

 

 

The Bab and Judaism I :

The Bab and Persian Jews of the Early Qajar period,  Shiraz, Bushire and elsewhere

Stephen Lambden, UC Merced.

In Progress and under revision from a 1980s manuscript - last updated 21-05-2021.

JEWS, CHRISTIANS AND THE BĀB I

Having outlined the career of the Bāb and given a few hints as to the nature of his teachings attention may now be turned to the question of his possible contacts with Jews and Christians and to their alleged influence upon him.

The Bāb and the Jews of Shirāz and Būshire

SHIRAZ

Shīrāz, the birthplace of the Bāb and of Bābīsm, in the 12th cent. CE had a Jewish population of almost 10,000 (so Benjamin of Tuleda). It was, from the 14th‑16th centuries CE, a great center of Persian‑Jewish culture. 1 But by the 19th cent., and, following the restrictions, harassment and forced conversions which accompanied and followed the establishment of Shī`ī Islām during the Savafid period (1502‑1722 CE), the Shirāzī Jews for the most part lived in a state of abject poverty. Throughout the Qājār period (1794‑1925 CE) they were subject to continual derision and persecution their numbers having dwindled to from between (perhaps) 2‑3,000 (late 1820's) to (perhaps) 5,000 (in 1897) ‑‑ at times falling considerably below these figures. 2

Joseph Wolff (1795‑186X), Christian missionary to the Jews, visited the Jewish quarter in northwest (old) Shīrāz in December 1824. He was moved to tears over those poverty‑stricken Jews who begged him for money and for the Gospel in Hebrew. 3 Like the few other Christian missionaries who visited these Jews in the first half of the 19th century, Wolff's efforts had little or no impact on a community largely ignorant of Christianity and subject to Muslim harassment. 4 Indeed, between c. 1825 and c.1835 CE fairly large numbers of them were forcibly converted to Islam. 5 Rabbi David d'bet Hillel reported such forced conversions shortly before 1827 6 while Israel Benjamin, perhaps referring to the same event (or other forced conversions a few years later?), noted the forced conversion of some 2,500 of the 3,000 Shīrāzī Jews. 7 Though, in consequence, the no less than nine synagogues of the Jadīd al‑Islam ("new Muslimsl") fell into disrepair, many, at least initially, remained crypto‑Jews or "marranos", 8 They, according to H.A. Stern, who also alluded to the forced conversions, formed the bulk of the silk merchants in the Vakil bazaar in Shīrāz. 9 The same writer noted the condition of those who refused to convert and who had not left Shīrāz (apparently 400 Jewish families); they led miserably poor lives in the squalid Jewish quarter as charm or amulet makers, fortune tellers, hawkers and owners of secret drinking houses (see ibid, 123‑8 and esp. 129).


  • 1. For a brief account of `Shiraz in Jewish History' see Loeb, 1977: 26‑34 (= chapter III).
  •  2. For some demographic data on 19th century Shīrāzī Jews see Spector, 19XX, Table II/4 Shiraz, 332‑333. Loeb, 1977: App. V. Estimates of the number of Jews in 19th century Shīrāz vary considerably in the light of the standpoints of the reporters of their numbers and such other factors as forced conversions and pogroms, earthquakes, famine and disease (cf. Loeb, 1977:6f). The total population of Shīrāz in 1811 was estimated at 19,000 (see Morier, 18XX:111) and in 1848 at 30,000 ‑‑ this latter estimate is probably too high (refer, Stern, 1854:132).
  • 3. Refer, Wolff, MJ II:36f,66. Wolff gave the "Hebrew Word of God" (text of the Gospel) to some 21 Jewish "mullas".
  • 4. cf. S. Wilberforce (ed), 18XX II:393 (= H. Martyn's journal entry for April 7th 1812, "They [about 12 Shīrāzī Jews] were utterly unacquainted with Jesus.."); Stern, 1854:127f.
  • 5. Small scale voluntary conversions to Islam among Shīrā zī Jews had occured earlier during the Qājār period (cf. Wolff, MJ., III: 33, 64f) and doubtless later also.
  • 6 .Noted by Loeb, 1977:132. See also M. Sel. `Shiraz' JE II: 296‑7.
  • 7 Refer, Benjamin, 1863:229. The figures given are rough estimates not to be relied upon. The exact circumstances precipitating the forced conversion of Shīrāzī Jews at this time appears not to be known.
  • 8. Refer, Benjamin, ibid:229‑30. Spector in this connection writes, "Benjamin found that many of the converts still practised Judaism in the 1840's. He met with many and held out the hope that European powers might come to their aid. This never happened, and the Shiraz Marranos were left to their own devices. Within a couple of generations they disappeared, becoming true Muslims" (19XX:191‑2).
  • 9. Refer, Stern, 1954:128 : "All the silk merchants in the bazaar Vekeel the most extensive market, are proselytes; and their descendants out of fear, strictly conform to all the rites of their new belief..[yet they] confessed their belief in Moses and the prophets, and their contempt, and abhorrence for everything connected with their adopted creed.".
  • 10. ??

BUSHIRE

Būshire was the home, during the first half of the 19th century, of something like 200‑800 Jews (the total population being about, 2‑5000?) 1 In November 1824 they were visited by Wolff who recorded his conversations with their then president Rabbi Yesriel and with other leading Jews. The diary notes in Vol. III of his Missionary Journal make it clear that at this time there were a number of Rabbis among these Jews who had a good knowledge of the Hebrew Bible and who did not hesitate to interpret it in a mystical and qabbalistic fashion. They, like many other Iranian Jews, anxiously awaited the advent of the Messiah and lamented the condition of their oppressed brethren. Unlike most other Iranian Jews they enjoyed a certain measure of freedom and protection. This, in part, due to the British presence in Bushire which contributed to the safety and wellbeing of a community described by Wolff (in 1824) as being composed of "either goldsmiths or brokers". Though "poorly dressed" they were undoubtedly much better off than the Jews of Shirāz. 2

In 1828 Būshire became the home of members of the family of Sassoon ibn Sālih (1750‑1830) for many years the chief banker or state treasurer to the Ottoman governor at Baghdad, nasi of the Jewish community there, and a wealthy merchant.3 His son, David Sassoon (b. Baghdad 1792 d. Bombay 1864), who accompanied his father to Būshire where he engaged in trade between 1828 and 1832, subsequently settled (in 1832) in Bombay where he established the famous David Sassoon and Co. ‑‑which, in due course, had many branches; for example, in Calcutta, Shanghai, Canton and Hong Kong 4 ‑‑ and where he took up trading and banking activities.5 Members of this Sassoon family and other Jewish merchants resident at Bushire after the 1820s were engaged in the opium trade and the export of silk and woollen cloth. They participated in the trade along the Persian Gulf as well as the Indian trade to Surat, Bombay and Madras.6.

Henry A.Stern preached to the Jews of Būshire in l848. He found them largely ignorant of religion (as he conceived it) and making up a smallish proportion of an estimated total population of 2,000. When he succeeded in converting Mulla Eliyahu, one of their more learned Rabbis, the Jewish community induced the Muslim Governor to have this Jewish convert (to Christianity) imprisoned. The British were later instrumental in securing his release (Stern, 1854:85‑7). This clearly implies that they exercised considerable local influence. 10

  • 1. See Spector, op.cit., Table II/10 Bushire, 335. Wolff in 1824 reckoned that there were 200 families at Bushire (living in 50 houses) and 4 synagogues (refer MJ III:11). In 1828 David d'Bet Hillel also counted "about 200 Jewish families" (see Fischel, `Bushire').
  • 2. See Wolff, MJ III:6f. 0n the British concern over the wellbeing of the Jews of Bushire see Spector, op.cit., 104ff.cf. Wright, 1977:45..
  • 3. 5 cf. J. Hy `Sassoon' JE X:67; Fischel, `Sassoon', `Bushire'.
  • 4. 6 Add note on Jews of Iranian and Iraqi origin in these places?
  • 5. 7 David Sassoon was the earliest member of the Sassoon family to attain distinction. On him see sources mentioned in fn.2. (+ bib.listed in these articles)
  • 6. 1 cf. Fischel, `Bushire'. See further, XXXX:The Bene Israel of India (London: 1984) esp.p.40ff; Isenberg, 1988.
  • 7. 2 cf. Spector, op.cit. 104, 166‑ 7. Benjamin visited the Jews of Bushire in 1850 (he found 70 families of Jews living there) and noted that their condition was less oppressed than elsewhere in Iran 1863:226

Between and around Shīrāz and Būshire in the 1st half of the l9th cent. there were, it may be noted here, other communities of Jews. Wolff in early 1825 found 30 families of Jews at Zarqun (about 20m NW of Shiraz), 20 families at Kazerun and 30 families at Boruzjan (on the 180 or so mile route between Būshire and Shīrāz; refer, MJ:III:22ff).

The Jews of Kazerun,

The Jews of Kazerun, a few of whom spoke Hebrew, were extremely poor ‑‑ they anxiously awaited the coming of the Messiah whom they thought would restore their recently destroyed ‑‑ by an earthquake ‑‑ homes, schools and synagogue. One of their learned men, Mulla David, said to Wolff, "We are now exiles on earth, and there are no people on earth so troubled as we are: we are considered as less than dogs and the Gojim [Gentiles] the Persians, trample upon us.. We must earn our livlihood by telling lies ‑‑ by writing talismans in fictitious characters and telling them [the Muslims] that they are written in Hebrew." (ibid.,p.33.) By the time Stern visited these Jews in 1848 (he estimated their number at 100) they were somewhat better off. Though most of them were still engaged in fortune telling and the writing of talismans for their Muslim neighbours, a few had acquired some wealth by dealing in `antiquities' (see Stern, 1854:114‑5).

The Jews of Boruzjan

The Jews of Boruzjan were also very poor. Wolff (in 1825) visited their two small synagogues and thought that "everything about them is witness to their poverty and misery" (op.cit. III:22). Stern, about 22 years later, noted that their only book was part of a Hebrew Bible given to them by Wolff. He described their synagogue as "a dark miserable hut, consisting of four bare walls, and a broken, uneven clay floor". He brought the miserable condition of these Jews (estimated as 10 families ) to the attention of Muammad usayn Khān the Governor who was amazed that anyone should be bothered about them (refer, Stern, 1854:109‑110).

The Bab and Mercantile Family Contacts.

If in the light of the foregoing it be asked whether or not the Bāb and his family had contact with the Jews of Shīrāz and Bushire it would seem highly likely that an affirmative answer should be given. 1 The young Bā b doubtless frequently came upon Jews and crypto‑Jews or Jadīd al‑Islam who, like his father and uncles, were engaged in similar trade in the Vakīl bazaar in Shīrāz. 2 The house of the Bāb in Shīrāz and other residences associated with his early years were situated very near the Jewish quarter (maalla)  in Shirāz ‑‑ a synagogue was located a very short distance from the Bāb's house in Shīrāz. 3 During the five year period of his mercantile activities in B¬shire, the Bāb very likely had business contacts and dealings with Jewish merchants. Like some among them he participated in the Indian trade (dealing, among other things, in tea, silk and indigo [nīl] and having trade links with Bombay, Madras and Calcutta, etc ). He, or members of his family, almost certainly had links with members of the Sassoon family during their residence in Bushire and after their taking up residence in Bombay ‑‑ intimate links certainly, a few decades later (l86O's > ?) existed between certain members of the Afnān family  (descendants of certain relatives of the Bāb) and leading merchants and members of the Sassoon family.4

  • 1 It is worth noting that the great‑grandfather of Hājjī `Abd al‑Rasul whose son Hājjī Muhammad Ibrahim was the brother in law of Hājjī Mīrzā Hasan `Alī (the maternal uncle of the Bāb; Khāl‑i Asghar) was apparently a Jew (or Jadīd al‑Islam? ‑‑ personal communication from  Aqā Mīrzā Abu'l‑Qāsim Afnān).
  • 2 The Bab's father, like many of the Shīrāzī Jadīd al‑Islam, was engaged in the cloth trade. cf. Bahadur. (trans.) 1927:447 where it is noted that the young Bāb "used to attend his father's cloth‑store after his studies in the morning". See further Amanat  1989: (= Early Years..102ff).
  • 3 Cf. The letter of the Bāb to Mullā Ṣādiq‑i Muqaddas‑i Khurasānī cited in Māzandarānī, ZH 3:149 and idem AAX:237.
  • 4 Muhammad `Alī Afnān (c.1820‑‑c.1896/7), a cousin of the Bāb (one of the sons of Hājjī Mīrzā Siyyid Muhammad, Khāl‑i Akbar (d. Shīrāz 1293/1876‑7) a maternal uncle of the Bāb) was, along with certain other relatives of the Bāb, from his residence in Bombay and subsequently Hong Kong (from the 1860's ?) in control of a large portion of the opium exports from Iran to China (cf. Fayḍī Khandan‑i Afnān,  esp p.81f; Amanat, Phd:115ff. This opium trade was the monopoly of the Sassoon family. As early as 1844 a trading house, initially under Elias David Sassoon (1819‑1880), was opened in China. By the 1860s branches of the David Sassoon Comp. existed in Shanghai, Hong Kong and other far eastern cities. It was active in the Persian Gulf trade and had major dealers in Isfāhān, Shīrāz and Būshire (cf. Akazaki, 1986:187 fn 45). Links between members of the Afnān family and such members of the Sassoon family as David Sassoon Sassoon (b.Bombay 1832 d. London 1867) and Solomon David Sassoon (b. Bombay 1841 d.Bombay 1894) were doubtless intimate.

That the Bāb had contact with the Jews of Shīrāz has been asserted by a few of the earliest European writers on Bābīsm. The French diplomat and writer Joseph A. Comte de Gobineau (1816‑1882) in his Les Religiones et les Philosophies.. (Paris 1865) and the Italian physician Michele Lessona (1823‑94) in his I Bābī  (written 1860's ? Pub. Turin 1881; probably drawing on Gobineau) both state that the Bāb had contact with the Jews and Zoroastrians of Shīrāz and had read the New Testament in Persian translation.1 Though this tradition may have originated in Muslim circles, being intended to underline the inferior and derivitive nature of the Bāb's teachings, it no doubt enshrines some truth 2 The Bāb's very probable mercantile links with Jews may well have made his attitude towards them more liberal than those of orthodox Shī`ī Muslims who viewed them with suspicion or contempt and regarded them as unclean (najis).

  • 1 Refer, Gobineau, Les Religiones..  (Paris 1865 + many later editions), xx ; Lessona, I Babi  (Turin 1881), cited U Giachery, `An Italian Scientist extolls the Bab' in BW XII:901. cf Levy, 19XX 3:604f. The unpublished trading accounts of the Bāb apparently confirm his links with Zoroastrians ‑‑ there appear to be traces of Zoroastrian influence in certain of the Bāb's writings, a matter which cannot be taken up here. On his alleged knowledge of the New Testament see below, 00 ff.
  • 2 It is not impossible that Gobineau's one time Persian teacher and Jewish informant on Bābism,  Mullā Lalizar (Eleazar) Hamadānī, was aware of the Bāb's links with Jews and informed Gobineau accordingly.